mountains search calendar close arrow-bold-left arrow-bold-right arrow-bold-top arrow-bold-bottom arrow-bottom arrow-bottom2 arrow-left arrow-right carbon-emissions dakota deforestation end-gun end-tobacco ethical-supply fossil-fuels gmo gun lgbtq prison refugees slaughterhouse support-women thumb-down thumb-up tobacco trump plus playbtn encrypt
Defund Pipelines on Indigenous Land

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) poses a serious threat to the water and lands of the Standing Rock Sioux of North Dakota. Protesters from a local Sioux tribe in North Dakota garnered national and international support to stop construction of the pipeline under a local water source, but President Trump and the Army Corps of Engineers allowed the pipeline to be completed in early 2017. The protesters argued that the pipeline’s route under the nearby Missouri River (800 meters from the Standing Rock Indian Reservation) threatened the tribe’s water and livelihood. They also claimed that construction sites traversed sacred lands. Despite pressure from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the companies responsible failed to properly consult tribes and conduct a full environmental impact survey.

Unfortunately this isn’t an isolated story: the Trans Mountain Pipeline, the Keystone XL, the Line 3, and the Energy East pipelines are all currently being built or operated without free, prior and informed consent from indigenous people.

Methodology

Researchers with Food and Water Watch compiled a list of financial institutions that invested in, or extended credit to, the holding companies that built and operate the various pipelines that cross indigenous land. OpenInvest verified these references by reviewing 8Ks and other financial statements. OpenInvest divests from the financial firms funding the pipelines, as well as the energy companies that own or operate the pipelines.

Additional Information

Why aren't you investing with your values?